01 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Compare each cycle to its standard
Review required steps and allowed variations against the standard agreed by the manager.
01 / 05 · WHAT IRUVY DOES
Review manual work, one cycle at a time.
Iruvy Flow is shaping a clear way for managers to review manual work against an agreed standard.
The redesigned manager workcell review is planned but has not been deployed. Flow controls sign-in and role-based access.
Iruvy FlowWORK-CYCLE REVIEW
01Standard
02Work cycle
03Evidence
04Review
OBSERVED · INFERRED · MISSINGPRODUCT DIRECTION FOR MANUAL WORK
02 / 05 · MANAGER REVIEW
A clear review, in four steps.
Set the standard first, define the cycle, review its evidence, then leave the decision with the manager.
Set the standard
Agree on required steps and allowed variation.
Define the work cycle
Define cycle boundaries and task sequence.
Review the evidence
Separate observed steps from gaps, occlusion and timing issues.
Manager disposition
Hold the review when evidence is incomplete.
03 / 05 · EVIDENCE REVIEW
See what’s known and what’s missing.
Review sources and limitations together. Keep work-standard adherence, pace or throughput, and product quality distinct.
REVIEW CONTEXT
- Source
- Camera, tool or existing process signals
- Observed
- Steps observed against a defined standard
- Inferred
- Confirm any derived interpretation before using it to judge a cycle.
- Missing
- Occlusion, unlinked signals and incomplete records
Do not treat sources as aligned facts before checking clocks, units, calibration and visibility.
04 / 05 · TASK-SELECTED SCOPE
Only what the task needs.
Vision, Core and Fusion are planned package areas. Compatibility, shipping contents, supported clients and performance are unverified.
02 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Keep each source in context
Relate video and existing sensor signals only after checking meaning, units and timing.
03 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Choose only task-relevant equipment
Vision is the starting input. Fusion may add task-relevant existing signals; Core is the shared package direction. NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano is an evaluation candidate. A manager display is optional; supported clients are unverified.
04 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Keep uncertainty visible
Separate observed, inferred and missing information. Hold judgment when evidence is incomplete.
05 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Keep outcome measures separate
Review work-standard adherence, pace or throughput, and product quality separately.
06 REVIEW PRINCIPLE
Open later stages after validation
More data alone does not advance the product. Quality judgment needs independent final-inspection, measurement or rework outcomes and verified defect labels. Automation needs task-specific success, failure, recovery, human-intervention and safety validation.
05 / 05 · PROPOSED CUSTOMER HANDOFF
A clear scope
for a first workcell.
A proposal for a future scope discussion, not an available software output or installation/deployment service.
- Task scope
- The recurring task and standard revision
- Evidence trace
- Sources, observed coverage, uncertainty and gaps
- Review state
- Manager disposition and any reason for a hold
- Workcell plan
- Needed sensors, connections, installation and validation scope
IRUVY FLOW
Make the next step clear.
WORKCELLS & PRODUCT DIRECTION
Explore task steps and sensor context.
See separate views of assembly, sensing and inspection work.
ASSEMBLY
Manual assembly
TASK FLOW
Assembly detail
SENSOR SCOPE
Sensor setup
SIGNAL CONTEXT
Signal context
LATER STAGE
Inspection step
QUALITY SCOPE
Inspection detail
CURRENT FLOW · SEPARATE WORKFLOW
Explore the image-inspection guide.
Current Flow software supports a separate image-inspection workflow. It is distinct from manager work-cycle review.
Image-inspection guide